Brazil lost Wednesday night away to Bolivia, and the way it happened has left the Seleção deeply frustrated. After the match, the focus was hardly on football and much more on everything surrounding it. "We played against the referees, the police, and the ball boys."
Embed from Getty Images
Brazil’s shock 1–0 defeat away to Bolivia on Wednesday night has sparked one of the most heated controversies of the South American World Cup qualifying campaign.
The Seleção, already assured of a place at the 2026 World Cup, may not have needed the points, but the manner of the loss left players, coaches, and officials furious. Instead of a routine qualifier, the match in La Paz turned into a political and sporting storm, overshadowed by officiating decisions, confrontations with local authorities, and the ever-present challenge of competing at extreme altitude.
From the start, Brazil’s players looked uncomfortable at nearly 4,000 meters above sea level. La Paz’s altitude has long been one of the most difficult environments in world football, where oxygen levels are low, stamina fades quickly, and every sprint feels heavier than normal. Brazil, traditionally one of the strongest teams in the region, have often struggled there, and Wednesday proved no exception. But according to the Brazilians, the atmosphere created off the pitch was just as suffocating as the altitude itself.
The decisive moment of the match came in first-half stoppage time. A seemingly light contact between Bruno Guimarães and Roberto Fernandez led to a penalty call, confirmed after VAR intervention. Bolivia’s Miguel Terceros stepped up and sent Alisson Becker the wrong way, giving the hosts a lead they would fiercely defend. The Brazilian bench erupted in protest, convinced that the foul was too soft to merit such a call. Players surrounded the referee, demanding an explanation, but the decision stood.
Brazilian frustration only grew as the second half unfolded. Every ball dispute seemed to go Bolivia’s way, and, according to the visitors, the match was marred by gamesmanship beyond the referee’s whistle. Ball boys allegedly delayed or interfered with play, tossing balls onto the pitch or refusing to return them quickly. There were also clashes between Brazilian staff and local police, who, according to reports, acted aggressively when approached by members of the visiting delegation.
After the final whistle, anger boiled over. Brazil’s players barely discussed tactics or football, focusing instead on what they called a hostile and unfair environment. One player summed up the mood bluntly: “We didn’t just play Bolivia tonight. We played against the referees, the police, and even the ball boys.”
Samir Xaud, president of the Brazilian Football Confederation, delivered a scathing statement to the press that quickly made headlines across the continent. “What happened here today is sad. We came here to play football, but from the moment we arrived, it was anti-football. Even at 4,000 meters above sea level we were not just facing Bolivia we were facing referees, police, and ball boys. It was truly a disaster.”
Xaud went further, criticizing the image projected by South American football on the international stage. “Playing at this altitude is already a huge challenge, but playing against fourteen men is unacceptable. Everything is recorded. It’s absurd. CONMEBOL must act.” He also accused the local police of mistreating players and staff. “They were rude to the entire team. We always welcome visiting sides in Brazil with hospitality. But here? The reception was ridiculous. I am furious.”
For Bolivia, however, the victory was historic and potentially decisive. The three points lifted them into seventh place in the table, the play-off spot that keeps their World Cup hopes alive until the very last day of qualifying. The celebrations in La Paz were ecstatic, with fans hailing Miguel Terceros as a hero for converting the penalty under immense pressure.
Elsewhere, the drama in South America continued. Venezuela’s 6–3 defeat to Colombia eliminated them from contention, with Sporting Portugal striker Luis Suárez who remarkably scored four goals becoming the night’s standout individual performer. His brilliance sealed Venezuela’s fate and further underscored the unpredictability of the qualifying campaign.
For Brazil, the defeat may not have changed their path to the 2026 World Cup, as qualification had already been secured. But reputationally, the match left scars. The Seleção remain fifth in the standings, safely inside the automatic qualification zone alongside Argentina, Ecuador, Colombia, Uruguay, and Paraguay. Still, Wednesday’s events serve as a reminder that South American football is as much about survival as it is about skill.
The fallout is expected to continue, with Brazil likely to push for CONMEBOL intervention. Whether the governing body will investigate the refereeing decisions, the behavior of match officials, or the reported misconduct of local authorities remains to be seen. For now, the match in La Paz will be remembered less for the football played and more for the controversy it sparked another chapter in the long, volatile history of South American qualifiers.
Updated: 11:24, 10 Sep 2025
